Monday, April 11, 2011

Critics

(Sarah Moon)

I've been reading an interview with Sarah Moon.  Even she is hurt and made uncertain by her critics.  I think they are why she makes so few images now.  It is easy to say simply that people are manipulative and always seeking to make the world in their own image, some much more aggressively than others.  It is easy to fight back--for others; but for your own work--well, that's another thing.  

Sarah Moon : I've always felt that photography provides an opportunity for staging, for telling a story through images. What I aim at, is an image with a minimum of information and markers, that has no reference to a given time or place - but that nevertheless speaks to me, that evokes something which happened just before or may happen just after. I know that many people question this way of photographing, but why should there be only one sort of photography? I want to create images with elements of my choosing, narrative or evocative, beyond the document about that particular woman wearing that dress. I give myself a literary frame, I tell a story. It's the only springboard I have found for taking a leap. On the other hand, I am interested in commercial photography because it provides me with a purpose. The agreement between client and photographer seems perfectly fair to me. They give me the opportunity to make images, on condition that I show their product in a favorable light. I get paid for doing it and am given the means to do it well. This submits me to a discipline, which is something I need, because for me it's easier to do things when I find myself obliged to do them. To do them just for my pleasure would seem irrelevant.

6 comments:

  1. Here's more criticism:

    Ick.

    The number of I's in her statement: 12
    The number of me's and my's: 6

    Yeah course she's talking about herself. But ick. It is like reading all the god-awful self-centered poems written these days. Who cares about the artist? The photographer? The poet? No one. It's about the work.

    God it sounds so silly to read "I think that is why she doesn't take so many pictures these days ..." She's a dope then. Rise above the criticism and do your work -- fuck em.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ick.

    8 I's
    1 "me"
    1 "mine"

    Lisa Nickerson said...
    I just found out I live close (about 40 miles) from the second riskiest plant in the United States. I've got some of those pills on reserve though. But shit, it'd be too late anyway I think.


    I am enjoying reading about cameras because it makes no sense to me whatsoever. I don't get it -- do cameras make people take better photos? or just a different type of photo? Is a good image with a bad camera -- bad? Is a bad image with a good camera good?

    I would think that all the stuff you do afterward is where the real manipulation happens but in the words of a favorite person of mine --- what the fuck do I know.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jesus, the more I think about this the more it bothers me. Sarah Moon's quote WAS talking about her work, and more specifically her intentions with it and relationship to it.

    Lisa,I believe you are in need of what poets sometimes call an "epiphany." But you show no signs of being on the verge of one.

    So...

    You are the most outspoken critic of Selavy's work, while offering up your own poetic works every chance you get, or when the poetic mood takes you.

    If I had more strength I would simply resist looking at the comments section of this site, but I lack that strength. Each day I press the button knowing that some smug, self-centered response awaits, usually with some uselessly condescending life advice that runs along the lines of, "fuck critics! read poetry, it is the news of the heart..."

    I could be wrong, but I sense that the post today was as much about you as it was about anything else: "seeking to make the world in their own image, some more aggressively than others."

    "Ich, Ich, Ich, Ich," - Sylvia Plath

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, I guess I'm weird but I enjoyed her interview. But we differ a lot in our philosophies...however it is enlightening to read what someone else things. Telling a story is the ultimate form of photography for me and if someone understands the story even in a different frame of reference than the way it is taken it is a successful photograph. If I'm obliged to do something though I shut down...doing it for my own pleasure is the only reason I can find to do it...but I don't mind when others like it too! :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. SeanQ

    Plath's poems don't move me either. I have always preferred Ted.

    oh and um .. ah ...yeah... welllllll... eh. nevermind.

    Much love,
    Lisa.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lisa,

    It would appear that you've missed the point yet again.

    With neither love nor malice,
    Sean

    ReplyDelete