Here's my "masterpiece." I'll bet you've never seen this one before. The big 8x10 camera on a sturdy tripod was hard to carry even to the yard. I'm pleased enough that the image turned out, and now I have confidence that I can make pictures with that monstrous thing, but I can't scan them after I do.
"What? What is this?"
This is only part of the 8x10 negative. For reasons I have yet to figure out, the scanner won't scan all of it. It only scans medium format sizes, so I have to find out if other software will let me scan the entire image with the Epson.
I scanned three images just fine--without realizing what was happening, but when I tried to scan the fourth, the sanner went haywire. Won't bore you with all of it, but after an internet search, I read that it possibly could be a dirty glass. That didn't sound feasible to me, but after fucking around with it for awhile, I got some alcohol and cleaned the dust and fingerprints off--and then it worked!
I had another scanner that did the same thing, so I trashed it and bought a new one. They ain't cheap. Now I know that all I needed to do with the other was clean the scanning glass.
Whatever.
It was only on the fourth scan, though, that I realized I was only getting a portion of the whole negative.
I think using the big fucker is cool, and I wonder if others might think so, too. I imagine many projects I might do. But if I took it out, would people stand before it?
I've become super paranoid in my old age.
And I ask you, is that image better than this one I made for Red in A.I.?
Youza!!! If you can't take the picture, make it. I think it is wonderful, really.
For all you A.I. haters, the only thing that stands between you and it is business interests. I took my mother's car in to get it detailed yesterday. It really needed it. I sat down inside the carwash for a bit and watched the incessant television that is omnipresent. Why? Do you really need a t.v. in a carwash? Restaurants?
TMZ was on. O.K. I'd watch a little trashy t.v. It's better than "The Golden Girls." The segment I saw was an interview with a plastic surgeon of some repute, I guess, or so they said. He had told his daughter not to go to med school but to become a lawyer instead. Why? A.I. He believes that there is going to be much less need for doctors in the future. Already, he said, A.I. does a better job of diagnosing illness than do the doctors at Mt. Sinnai, one of the best hospitals in the world--80% of the time.
I don't find that difficult to believe at all.
A.I. robots, he said, are already great at some types of surgeries, and they are only going to get better. "But they can't do the aesthetic work you do?" quizzed the moderator.
"A.I. is so good at aesthetics now, it might do a better job," he said. But, and here's the thing, the AMA has such power, they will slow down if not kill the infusion of this technology.
And that is it, isn't it? It will be a battle of the dollar. Hospitals will want to do everything with robots that cost less than doctors and doctors will fight back. The business of America is business. I forget who said that.
A.I. is great. I just looked it up. Calvin Coolidge.
As I see it, A.I. is a tremendous tool, but it is just a tool. People who rely on it rather than use it are fucking up, I think. If I had an A.I. robot taking out my appendix, I sure as shitting would want a doctor there to supervise. I wouldn't want old Short Circuit ripping out my guts because it got a virus. I would want the doc there to hit the panic button.
But the MBAs that run hospitals won't want to pay for both. I think the real innovations will not come from America but from China.
All that remains to be seen.
Yesterday, when thinking about really good photographers who worked with 8x10 cameras, I forgot about one with whose work I was enamored when I was a college wannabe photo student. Emmet Gowin. He was one of my favorites. Last night, I watched a little YouTube thing on him. He was from rural Virginia like Sally Mann, but what I didn't know was that he had been her photography professor in college and became one of her major influences. Yes, of course. That makes sense. Ten years after I'd seen Gowin's photos, I saw Mann's.
Here's the doc, if you are interested. And just like any YouTube video on Mann, they can't show Gowin's most intimate work. If you are interested in that, you'll have to look it up.










.jpg)











