Last night, I bought a copy of Vanity Fair at Whole Foods. That's weird enough. I haven't bought one for a long time. It was a thick issue, though, and the magazine used to have some good articles. I paged through it after dinner. The first quarter of the magazine was all ads. I'm OK with that. I looked at the photography closely and concluded that it was all pretty unimaginative. How much are those companies paying for that? I know that everyone is using high end equipment, big digital Hasselblads, etc, but none of it does much. I'm offering my low end specialties to any company that wants beautiful grunge.
Then I read the Editor's Letter, and I realized why the magazine has taken a nosedive. You can probably read it online. Far too much self there. Let him start a blog and write under a pseudonym and see how long he lasts.
I'm hoping there is something good inside.
But so much for that. The photo here isn't really top notch, but it is current, and after looking at V.F., I'm not going to worry.
I know squat about photography. But this is a woman on a poetry website I frequent -- I think her portraits and wedding photos are really good -- not run of the Olan Mills.
ReplyDeletewww.jenmartinstudios.com
Vanity Fair, Inflated Superficiality, Specious Pleasure.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the problem?
It's been a long time for me too since I've looked at a Vanity Fair. This picture of the boy looks a little more like an early Elvis, if he was just sneering a little more.
ReplyDelete